The Truth About Wearables: Accuracy, Metrics, and Why Heart Rate Monitoring Matters

Summary

In this Q&A article, we debunk the findings of a recent study that claimed phones are just as, if not more accurate at tracking fitness than wearables. We conducted our own test with various wearables and phones to measure step counting accuracy and caloric burn. The results showed that while phones may be more accurate at step counting in some instances, wearables with heart rate monitoring capabilities are essential for accurately measuring caloric burn.

Introduction:

Wearables have been a popular trend in the fitness world for quite some time now. However, a recent study claiming that phones are just as effective, if not more accurate at tracking fitness than wearables has caused quite a stir. In this article, we’ll be conducting our own test and exploring the truth about wearables, accuracy, metrics, and why heart rate monitoring matters.

Are phones more accurate than wearables for tracking fitness?

We conducted a step counting test with various wearables and phones to see if the recent study’s findings hold any truth. While the results showed that phones may be more accurate in some instances, it’s important to note that step counting isn’t the best metric for measuring fitness levels.

Why is step counting not a good metric for measuring fitness levels?

Simply put, step counting doesn’t account for factors such as the intensity or type of activity being performed. Our test showed that even activities such as whittling can trigger false positives in step counting. For a more accurate measurement of physical activity, caloric burn is a better metric to use.

Why does heart rate monitoring matter in wearables?

Heart rate monitoring is essential for accurately measuring caloric burn. We conducted a bike-riding test with various wearables, and those with heart rate monitoring capabilities showed significantly higher caloric burn measurements compared to those without. Step counting may be an important metric for some individuals, but for those looking to accurately track their fitness and weight-loss progress, heart rate monitoring is vital.

Conclusion:

While phones may be more accurate in certain instances for step counting, wearables with heart rate monitoring capabilities remain essential for accurately measuring fitness levels. The best wearable for users will depend on their personal fitness goals and preferences. However, it’s clear that heart rate monitoring should be a key consideration when choosing a wearable for fitness tracking.