Language Pet Peeves: The Evolution of Language
Summary
In this article, we delve into the linguistic phenomena of eggcorns, vocal fry, and uptalk. We explore how eggcorns are creative mishearings that can become accepted language usage over time. We also discuss how vocal fry and uptalk are often criticized for making speakers sound less intelligent, competent, and trustworthy, particularly young women. However, we suggest that creaky voice has a linguistic function in some languages and is not damaging to the voice if used in moderation.
Table of Contents
- Eggcorns: Creative Mishearings
- Vocal Fry and Uptalk: Criticisms and Linguistic Function
- A Hint at a Forthcoming Discussion of a Grammar Rule
- Conclusion
Eggcorns: Creative Mishearings
Eric Singe, a dialect coach, introduces us to eggcorns, which are misheard expressions that sound like the original, such as “for all intensive purposes” instead of “for all intents and purposes.” He finds them creative and fun, and notes that they are a transitional stage in the evolution of language. Singe also introduces the concept of folk etymology, which is when a misheard expression becomes the accepted version of a word or phrase. Examples of this include “burger” and “shamefaced.” Words can also change meaning over time, such as “female” and “cockroach,” which have nothing to do with their etymological roots.
Vocal Fry and Uptalk: Criticisms and Linguistic Function
The article also discusses vocal fry and uptalk. Vocal fry is a phenomenon that occurs when the vocal folds vibrate more slowly, creating a creaky sound, while uptalk is the rising pitch at the end of a sentence. Both vocal fry and uptalk are often criticized for making speakers sound less intelligent, competent, and trustworthy, particularly young women. However, creaky voice has a linguistic function in some languages, and the article suggests that it is not damaging to the voice if used in moderation.
A Hint at a Forthcoming Discussion of a Grammar Rule
The article hints at a forthcoming discussion of a grammar rule, which suggests that language evolves over time and that some grammar rules are more flexible than others. The article notes that some rules are worth following, while others are not.
Conclusion
In conclusion, language is constantly evolving, and eggcorns, vocal fry, and uptalk are just a few examples of how language changes over time. While some linguistic phenomena are criticized for making speakers sound less intelligent, competent, and trustworthy, they can also have a linguistic function in some languages. As we continue to study language, we must remain open to the evolution of language and the creative ways in which it changes over time.
